← Dataset search
SRR15608959
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Phage 434
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
102714866
reported
total reads
341536
reported
n content pct
0.235
measured
pct q20 bases
85.7
measured
pct q30 bases
81.9
measured
gc content pct
50.6
measured
mean read length
150.6
measured
mean base quality
33.1
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
14.27
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
81.9
measured
×1
60%
duplication rate pct
14.27
measured
×0.5
80%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0