Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Listeria monocytogenes WGS with grade B quality (88/100). Duplication at 22.51% is the primary QC limiter, indicating moderate PCR bias that could skew variant calls and repeat-region coverage; this matters especially for copy-number-sensitive genomic features. Strong compensating metrics (Q30 98.5%, zero adapter) support reliable sequence accuracy.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0