SRR1576778

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

46/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii ECNIH3

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 641331200 reported

total reads 1603328 reported

n content pct 0.018 measured

pct q20 bases 85.1 measured

pct q30 bases 73 measured

gc content pct 54.5 measured

mean read length 200 measured

mean base quality 30.9 measured

adapter content pct 5.25 measured

duplication rate pct 11.2 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 46/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73 measured ×1 15%

duplication rate pct 11.2 measured ×0.5 90%

adapter content pct 5.25 measured ×0.4 70%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0