Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq with acceptable base quality severely compromised by exceptional duplication. Grade B reflects borderline Q30 bases (86.5%) and duplication at 64.1% (the lowest-scoring metric at 24/100), indicating PCR over-amplification or saturation of abundant transcripts. Reuse requires statistical deduplication or filters for highly expressed genes.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0