Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
54/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-Seq of Manduca sexta transcriptome generated ~10M reads (1.2 billion bases) with 76.7% Q30 bases and 44.7% GC content. The dataset provides whole-organism or tissue-specific gene expression profiling for this lepidopteran insect but with moderate base quality that may limit sensitive isoform detection. Appropriate for primary transcriptome characterization and differential expression studies where high Q-score bases dominate the signal.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0