SRR1596465

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bulk RNA-seq from mosquito; QC grade A marks this suitable for reuse despite moderate duplication (43.75%). Elevated N content (0.423%) and 43.75% duplication slightly reduce effective coverage, but excellent base quality (Q30 90.8%, mean 35.8) supports downstream analysis with standard deduplication.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Anopheles gambiae

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2573897070 reported

total reads 15140571 reported

n content pct 0.423 measured

pct q20 bases 95.8 measured

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured

gc content pct 52.3 measured

mean read length 85 measured

mean base quality 35.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.51 measured

duplication rate pct 43.75 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.8 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.51 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 43.75 measured ×0.4 69%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0