SRR1621223

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ChIP-seq

Organism

Escherichia coli O157:H7

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 659120000 reported

total reads 3295600 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 85.2 measured

pct q30 bases 79.4 measured

gc content pct 51.6 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 32 measured

adapter content pct 1.13 measured

duplication rate pct 24.24 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 79.4 measured ×1 47%

QC cost 47 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0