SRR1631061

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS from human skin metagenome; QC grade D signals significant quality concerns limiting reusability. High adapter content (27.38%) indicates contaminated libraries, and Q30 of 84.3% falls below standards for reliable variant calling—requires aggressive quality filtering and may lose microbial diversity.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human skin metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5012162774 reported

total reads 24812687 reported

n content pct 0.576 measured

pct q20 bases 94.9 measured

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured

gc content pct 53.5 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 33.7 measured

adapter content pct 27.38 measured

duplication rate pct 1.03 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured ×1 72%

duplication rate pct 1.03 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 27.38 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0