SRR1649325

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bulk RNA-seq from ginseng; QC grade C indicates borderline data requiring caution for reuse. Q30 (79.8%) and mean quality (32.6%) together create modest noise across the dataset; low duplication (17.27%) and minimal contamination are positive, but downstream analysis should incorporate additional quality filtering for abundance stability.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Panax ginseng

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2261990497 reported

total reads 8083172 reported

n content pct 0.01 measured

pct q20 bases 89.6 measured

pct q30 bases 79.8 measured

gc content pct 42.2 measured

mean read length 139.4 measured

mean base quality 32.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.51 measured

duplication rate pct 17.27 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 79.8 measured ×1 49%

mean base quality 32.6 measured ×0.6 77%

adapter content pct 0.51 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 17.27 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0