Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore GridION long-read WGS of Caenorhabditis elegans generated 1.1M reads spanning 9.5 Gb with high coverage (94.7×) but lower per-base accuracy (70.5% Q20). This dataset enables detection of structural variants, complex genomic rearrangements, and repetitive regions that short reads cannot resolve, though base quality requires consensus polishing.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0