Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome shotgun sequencing of Clavispora phyllophila yeast generated 1.2M reads with moderate quality (81.4% Q20) and 41.5% GC content. This genome resequencing dataset is suitable for assembly of fungal genomes or variant discovery, though lower sequence quality and modest depth require careful quality filtering.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0