Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Uncultured bacterium amplicon 454 sequencing with grade B quality (82/100). Long reads (mean 453.5 bp) support taxonomic resolution, but Q30 84.7% and extreme duplication 97.61% are notable; while high duplication is typical for PCR amplicons, it may overrepresent abundant sequence variants without computational deduplication.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0