SRR1734646

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

55/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salvia miltiorrhiza

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 560136248 reported

total reads 1161759 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 90.5 measured

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured

gc content pct 38.5 measured

mean read length 360.4 measured

mean base quality 33.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 15.25 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 55/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured ×1 26%

duplication rate pct 15.25 measured ×0.5 77%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0