Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of the silk moth *Antheraea pernyi* yields 21.7M reads and 3.9 Gb bases with 93.5% Q20, supporting transcript mapping of silk protein production, development, and metamorphosis in this economically important Lepidopteran. Search: *Antheraea pernyi* transcriptome, silk moth, Lepidoptera RNA-seq.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0