Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of *Aedes albopictus* produces 7.2M reads with lower 87.1% Q20 and 80.4% Q30, providing moderate transcript coverage suitable for discovery of highly- and moderately-expressed genes in mosquito tissues or infection states despite quality caveats. Search: *Aedes albopictus* transcriptome, dengue mosquito, RNA-seq.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0