Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of *Anopheles gambiae* produces 6.7M reads with lower 86.6% Q20 but adequate depth for moderate-to-highly-expressed transcript discovery in mosquito tissues or developmental stages relevant to malaria transmission. Search: *Anopheles gambiae* RNA-seq, mosquito transcriptomics.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0