Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of *Anopheles gambiae* yields a smaller 2M reads but with 94.4% Q20, suitable for focused transcript profiling of specific tissues, developmental stages, or genes of interest in this malaria vector. Search: *Anopheles gambiae* RNA-seq, malaria mosquito transcriptomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0