Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Anopheles gambiae on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 yields ~5.3 million reads at moderate base quality (87.6% ≥Q20), enabling transcriptome profiling of this malaria vector with lower-than-typical quality. The substantial read count enables abundance estimation. Reuse requires careful quality filtering.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0