Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from Papilio machaon with grade-A score, moderate 36.8% duplication offset by high base quality (Q30=91.6%, mean=35.8), minimal adapter contamination (0.43%), and long read length (91 bp). Longer reads improve mapping disambiguation and unique-sequence placement. Recommended for high-confidence expression profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0