Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Bombyx mori on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 generates ~45.3 million reads at high base quality (98.4% ≥Q20), enabling comprehensive transcriptome profiling of this silkworm model organism for studies of development, immunity, and silk protein synthesis. The substantial read depth and exceptional quality support robust quantification and isoform detection. Reuse for comparative transcriptomics is well-supported.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0