Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Locusta migratoria on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 yields ~65 million reads at exceptional base quality (99.3% ≥Q20), enabling very deep transcriptome profiling of the migratory locust for studies of phase polyphenism and behavioral development. The exceptional quality and substantial depth support rare transcript detection. Reuse for comprehensive transcriptomics is well-supported.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0