SRR1779092

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human whole genome from HiSeq 2500 with 5.1B bases but shallow coverage (1.7×) and 87.2% Q30, making it unsuitable for confident variant calling or population inference. Use only for low-resolution reference alignment or as a control in comparative studies requiring genome presence/absence.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5138207340 reported

total reads 25436670 reported

mean coverage 1.7 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 93.7 measured

pct q30 bases 87.2 measured

gc content pct 39.3 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 34.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 1.06 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 1.7 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 87.2 measured ×1 86%

duplication rate pct 1.06 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0