Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generates ~12.8 million reads at high base quality (94.7% ≥Q20) with estimated 0.8× mean coverage, enabling shallow genome sequencing suitable for common variant detection and population studies. The very low coverage limits variant detection power. Reuse for allele frequency estimation and imputation reference panels is appropriate.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0