Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 yields ~16.5 million reads at high base quality (94.6% ≥Q20) with estimated 1.1× mean coverage, enabling shallow genome sequencing for population studies and common variant detection. The very low coverage limits variant detection power. Reuse for allele frequency studies is appropriate.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0