Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 yields ~152 million reads at high base quality (94.9% ≥Q20) with estimated 9.9× mean coverage, enabling substantial genome-wide sequencing suitable for variant discovery and structural analysis. The ~10× coverage enables reasonable variant calling confidence. Reuse for population genomics and variant studies is well-supported.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0