Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 1000 RNA-seq of the honey bee *Apis mellifera* generates 39.3M reads, 1.97 Gb bases, and 96.6% Q20, enabling comprehensive mapping of bee transcriptomes across tissues, developmental stages, or behavioral states with high fidelity. The large dataset supports isoform-level analysis. Search: honey bee transcriptome, *Apis mellifera* RNA-seq, social insect genomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0