SRR1799565

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Aspergillus ellipticus RNA-seq with acceptable base quality (Q30=86%, mean Q=33.4) and well-controlled adapter content (4.29%), modestly offset by elevated duplication (31.45%) that may reflect transcript complexity in fungi. Q30 at 86% is typical for RNA-seq and adequate for expression quantification. Suitable for reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Aspergillus ellipticus CBS 707.79

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 10336930500 reported

total reads 34456435 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 93.2 measured

pct q30 bases 86 measured

gc content pct 55.2 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 33.4 measured

adapter content pct 4.29 measured

duplication rate pct 31.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86 measured ×1 80%

mean base quality 33.4 measured ×0.6 90%

adapter content pct 4.29 measured ×0.4 87%

duplication rate pct 31.45 measured ×0.4 97%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0