Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 RNA-seq of the harvester ant *Pogonomyrmex barbatus* yields 8.4M reads with exceptional 99% Q20 and 97.1% Q30, enabling high-fidelity profiling of colony-level gene expression, reproductive suppression, and caste differentiation in this model social insect. Search: *Pogonomyrmex barbatus* transcriptome, ant genomics, social behavior genetics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0