Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR1822384

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (Capra hircus) with perfect A-grade score (100/100). High base quality (Q30 94.3%, mean 36.5) and moderate duplication (29.74%) indicate robust library construction and sequencing. All metrics pass perfectly, enabling confident transcript-level analysis.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Capra hircus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 4738418400 reported
total reads 23692092 reported
n content pct 0.004 measured
pct q20 bases 98.3 measured
pct q30 bases 94.3 measured
gc content pct 50.2 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 36.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 29.74 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.3 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 29.74 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89