Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR1917336

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

26/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is a human microRNA sequencing run (miRNA-Seq on Illumina HiSeq 2000), and in QC terms it fails outright (26/100, grade F), meaning it is not recommended for reuse without serious caveats. The grade was driven down most by an extreme duplication rate of ~79% — though for small-RNA libraries some of this is expected, since the miRNA pool is low-complexity and short reads collapse onto identical sequences, so this metric should be interpreted cautiously rather than taken as pure library failure — and by weak base quality, with only 72.3% of bases at Q30 and a mean Phred of 29.2, which erodes confidence in precise read alignment and miRNA isoform/variant calling. The one clear positive is essentially negligible adapter contamination (0.11%), notable because the short ~25.7 bp reads sit right at the adapter-readthrough danger zone, so clean adapter trimming here is genuinely reassuring. Note that evidence_strength is the lowest possible (1): core volume figures (total reads/bases, checksum) are only reported rather than independently measured, so while the quality metrics themselves were measured, the overall picture remains provisional pending a deeper verified pass.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 1224120746 reported
total reads 49843294 reported
n content pct 0.028 measured
pct q20 bases 79.4 measured
pct q30 bases 72.3 measured
gc content pct 44.5 measured
mean read length 25.7 measured
mean base quality 29.2 measured
adapter content pct 0.11 measured
duplication rate pct 78.98 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 26/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 72.3 measured ×1 12%
mean base quality 29.2 measured ×0.6 20%
adapter content pct 0.11 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 78.98 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89