Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq short-read (yeast). Grade C—marginal for reuse. Measured duplication (62.8%, component score 27/100) and adapter content (10.69%, component score 52/100) are both high; short read length (49 bp, measured) compounds mapping ambiguity. Acceptable only for large-scale expression surveys; unsuitable for single-gene validation studies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0