SRR192554

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

36/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

marine metagenome

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 175007353 reported

total reads 344750 reported

n content pct 0.035 measured

pct q20 bases 88.3 measured

pct q30 bases 70.4 measured

gc content pct 46.1 measured

mean read length 358 measured

mean base quality 32.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 23.4 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 36/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 70.4 measured ×1 2%

duplication rate pct 23.4 measured ×0.5 52%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0