Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS short-read (Salmonella). Grade B—acceptable for variant calling but duplication-limited. Duplication at 21.5% (measured, component score 58/100) is the primary drag and elevates false-positive risk for rare-variant discovery; adapter content (2%, scored 93/100) is minor. Use with variant filtering for low-allele-fraction calls.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0