Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS short-read sequencing (Salmonella). Grade B quality passes minimum standards but shows measured concerns in two key metrics—duplication at 19.4% (scores 64/100) and adapter content at 5.9% (scores 65/100)—both of which matter for variant calling accuracy by elevating false-positive risk in high-duplication regions. Suitable for reuse with standard trimming and variant filtering, though margin for error is tighter than A-grade samples.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0