Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS short-read (Salmonella Sinstorf). Grade C—problematic adapter contamination. Measured adapter content of 16.23% (component score 0/100) is the critical failure, indicating incomplete library prep or input contamination; duplication (18.31%, measured) and Q30 (96.7%, measured) are otherwise acceptable. Aggressive trimming required before variant calling.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0