Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup generated on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding ~253 million bases across 1.3 million reads with exceptional quality (99.9% Q20 bases, 51.1% GC). This dataset is suitable for bacterial genomics applications including SNP calling, structural variant detection, and comparative genomic analysis, though the moderate depth may require careful consideration of coverage requirements for your specific application.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0