Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2500 short-read whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup, generating 278 million bases with high average quality (98.9% Q20, 93.9% Q30, 50.9% GC). This dataset is appropriate for strain identification, resistance-gene profiling, and phylogenomic placement within the Salmonella enterica complex.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0