Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing of *Salmonella enterica* serovar Panama achieves 99.9% Q20 bases and 98.9% Q30 across 1.1M reads, yielding assembly-grade quality for reconstructing this pathogen's complete genome and detecting antibiotic resistance loci. The small bacterial genome requires only ~30 Mb coverage for high-confidence SNP calling and phylogenetic placement. Search: *Salmonella enterica* WGS, bacterial genomics, serovar Panama.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0