SRR1969826

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-quality WGS with exceptional measured base quality (Q37.5, 99.5% Q30, perfect Q20) and low adapter content (2.32%). Measured duplication (22.89%, scoring 54/100) is the only minor caveat, likely from legitimate PCR amplification for shallow initial coverage; all metrics are fully measured, supporting confident reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Bareilly

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 195823813 reported

total reads 1025391 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 99.5 measured

gc content pct 51.8 measured

mean read length 96.9 measured

mean base quality 37.5 measured

adapter content pct 2.32 measured

duplication rate pct 22.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 99.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 22.89 measured ×0.5 54%

adapter content pct 2.32 measured ×0.4 91%

QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0