Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
40/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Ion Torrent PGM RNA-seq of *Bactrocera dorsalis* yields 1.8M reads with consistent 76.2% Q30, pairing with SRR1979069 to provide replicate transcript quantification for this tropical fruit pest. Platform-specific error profiles (primarily homopolymer runs) are manageable via tolerant alignment thresholds. Search: *Bactrocera* fruit fly, Ion Torrent RNA-seq.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0