← Dataset search
SRR1981038
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
438998826
reported
total reads
1749779
reported
mean coverage
95.4
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
97.7
measured
pct q30 bases
89.1
measured
gc content pct
50.4
measured
mean read length
133.8
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
adapter content pct
1.1
measured
duplication rate pct
12.43
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
95.4
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
89.1
measured
×1
96%
duplication rate pct
12.43
measured
×0.5
86%
adapter content pct
1.1
measured
×0.4
99%
QC cost
4.9 min compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0