SRR19851129
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Wastewater metagenome amplicon profiling using long-read MinION (Oxford Nanopore) generated 113k reads averaging 338.9 bp, enabling full-length 16S or ITS recovery for precise taxonomic identification. However, the moderate 44% Q20 and low 10.1% Q30 reflect Nanopore basecall characteristics; pre-filtering and consensus calling recommended to mitigate high error rates, though long-reads outweigh substitution errors for species-level classification.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.