Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR20018633

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Wastewater amplicon sequencing on MiSeq with 512k medium-length reads (202.6 bp) at 92.5% Q20 and 89.3% Q30 supports species-level microbial identification. The 33.6% GC suggests potential bias toward AT-rich sequences or amplification artifacts; adequate for microbial surveillance of pathogenic Enterobacteria or indicator organisms in wastewater.

Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
wastewater metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 208138224 reported
total reads 512762 reported
n content pct 0.233 measured
pct q20 bases 92.5 measured
pct q30 bases 89.3 measured
gc content pct 33.6 measured
mean read length 202.6 measured
mean base quality 35.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 94.76 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.3 measured ×1 97%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%
QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 75