Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS short-read (human skin metagenome). Grade B—good for taxonomic profiling and assembly. Duplication at 20.92% (measured, component score 60/100) is the limiting factor; Q30 (96.9%) and adapter content (0.04%) are strong. Expect inflated abundance estimates of highly amplified taxa; apply post-hoc normalization.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0