SRR2005712

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2000 metagenomic WGS of human skin microbiota achieves 99.3% Q20 across 1.6M reads—high-quality data suitable for profiling bacterial and archaeal community composition and predicting functional pathways through reference-based or de novo assembly. The 39.1% GC reflects the mixed-species sample. Search: skin microbiome, human metagenomics, metagenomic WGS.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human skin metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 315147187 reported

total reads 1610422 reported

n content pct 0.041 measured

pct q20 bases 99.3 measured

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured

gc content pct 39.1 measured

mean read length 99.8 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.34 measured

duplication rate pct 39.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 39.45 measured ×0.5 2%

adapter content pct 0.34 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0