Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from Cimex lectularius on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, producing 7.8 billion bases with consistently high quality (98.6% Q20, 95.9% Q30, 42.6% GC) across 39 million reads. The dataset enables comprehensive transcriptome characterization, gene-discovery applications, and quantitative expression analysis in bedbug biology or vector-competence research.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0