Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Sistrurus tergeminus (massasauga rattlesnake) RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 with exceptional depth (22.1B bases, 110.9M reads) and 82.7% Q30 — essentially a small vertebrate genome equivalent. This ultra-deep transcriptome is excellent for comprehensive gene annotation, splicing characterization, and reptile comparative genomics; search for snake transcriptomics or non-mammalian vertebrate expression.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0