Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing (Drosophila melanogaster). Grade B, provisional pending measured coverage validation. Q30 of 81.7% is below ideal thresholds (58/100 score) for variant accuracy, while mean_coverage of 48.4x is extrapolated (not measured). If coverage is confirmed, depth may partially compensate for Q30 shortfall; evidence strength is 0.61.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0