Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx whole-genome sequencing of Drosophila melanogaster with 5.7 billion bases at estimated 41.1x coverage and moderate quality (92.6% Q20, 84.4% Q30). The dataset is suitable for variant discovery and genome annotation applications, though the Q30 percentage indicates value in quality-based read trimming before analysis of variants with low allelic frequencies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0