Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generates ~214 million reads spanning 32.2 billion bases at exceptional base quality (98.5% ≥Q20, 96.5% ≥Q30), enabling deep human transcriptome profiling for comprehensive gene expression analysis, rare transcript detection, and isoform quantification. The exceptional depth and quality are exceptional. Reuse for single-cell projection and population transcriptomics is well-supported.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0